Here you should definitely use examples to support your evaluation. Take notes and highlight major points, the sources used, and the logic of the argument presented. In other words, how effectively does the book come together? Did you nod in agreement or off to sleep? Are these aims supported or justified?
You might want to take the major organizing themes of the book and use them to organize your own discussion. Identify the assumptions made by the author in both the approach to and the writing of the book.
Use examples to amplify your responses. Amplify upon and explain your reactions. How well have they been achieved, especially with regard to the way the book is organized? To what extent — and how effectively — were your expectations met? Throughout your summary, I want you to provide a critique of the book.
The skills you need are an ability to follow an argument and test a hypothesis. Writing a book review Write some questions based on the list above: When was it written?
That is, tell the reader what you think and how you arrived at this judgment. On what basis has this opinion been formulated? You need to use your other sources too. Your introduction will usually include: How well is evidence used? As a student you will be expected to demonstrate that you have examined the book from several angles.
How effectively does the author draw claims from the material being presented?
While you may use direct quotes from the book make sure you always give the page numbersuch quotes should never be the bulk of the summary. Are connections between the claims and evidence made clearly and logically? Do NOT spend more than one-third or so of the paper summarizing the book.
Do these conclusions follow from the thesis and aims and from the ways in which they were developed? Who is the intended audience? After reading Use your notes to evaluate the book.
Structuring the book review Most book reviews are between words, though an academic review may go up to Are you able to detect any underlying philosophy of history held by the author e.
Nor do you need to know as much about the subject as the author because you hardly ever will.The critical book review in history is unique to the discipline and a skill that is expected to be mastered by history students after their first year. Understanding what a critical book review in history is supposed to consist of is the first step in writing one.
Writing a book review is not the same as writing a book report or a summary.
A book review is a critical analysis of a published work that assesses the work's strengths and weaknesses. Many authors strive to have their books reviewed by a professional because a published review (even a negative one) can be a great source of publicity. A book review is a critical assessment of a book.
It describes and evaluates the quality and significance of a book and does not merely summarise the content. Writing a book review Before reading. Write some questions based on the list above: Why has the book been written? Sample book review.
This book review is included here with the. Your review should have two goals: first, to inform the reader about the content of the book, and second, to provide an evaluation that gives your judgment of the book’s quality. Your introduction should include an overview of the book that both incorporates an encapsulated summary and a.
Writing a five-page critical book review is not always an easy task. Space is limited, examples, clear logic, and good reasoning. Further, be sure to provide scriptural and non- Guidelines for Writing a Critical Book Review Author: Chuck Lawless.
What is a review? A review is a critical evaluation of a text, event, object, or phenomenon. Reviews can consider books, articles, entire genres or fields of literature, architecture, art, fashion, restaurants, policies, exhibitions, performances, and many other forms.
This handout will focus on book reviews.Download